If the reader has Critical Thinking skills, then the reader always fact-checks the author. Let me provide you with a little something about a reader's responsibility (if one cares about truth.)

"I do not care if what they are saying is true or not, at this point, the lack of sourcing does not make them credible." Did you think about that before you wrote it? Did you read it after you wrote it? It makes no sense at all. I would find it amusing, esxcept it frightens me that a presumed adult wrote such an inane thing.

Perhaps it is due to my past in academic venues, but there is a research standard called "triangulating the data." You are obviously not familiar with it. If you think about it, then you may realize that you are an unsourced author. No one who reads you has any obligation to believe what you write, just as anyone who gets their information from say, Fox, or the White Information Network, has any reason to take them at their word. Now, a treat for you. I'm betting that you're not enough of a critical thinker to read it. (I pray that you do not vote with the mentality that everything on the internet is true.)

https://untiredteacher.medium.com/a-plea-a-prayer-and-a-plaint-for-critical-thinking-b5223d5f504e